高院今天这么一大堆判例没人讨论吗？

#p-8448643-asylum-seekers-at-the-border-mullin-v-al-otro-lado-1Asylum Seekers at the Border ( Mullin v. Al Otro Lado ) Vote: 6-3 Majority: Justice Alito authored the opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Dissent: Justice Sotomayor authored the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-5_86qd.pdf: In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that noncitizens standing on the Mexican side of the border have not legally “arrived in the United States.” The case hinged on the interpretation of the word “in” within immigration law. News Coverage: https://magnoliatribune.com/2026/06/26/supreme-court-clears-way-for-trump-administration-to-revive-restrictive-policy-for-asylum-seekers/ (Magnolia Tribune) The Impact: This is a major victory for the Trump administration, allowing it to revive “metering”—a policy that permits federal border agents to physically block asylum seekers from setting foot on U.S. soil. Because U.S. law guarantees the right to claim asylum only once a person has arrived in the country, this fundamentally reshapes the asylum system by allowing the government to turn migrants away before they can legally make a claim. #p-8448643-temporary-protected-status-mullin-v-doe-2Temporary Protected Status ( Mullin v. Doe ) Vote: 6-3 Majority: Justice Alito authored the opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Dissent: Justice Kagan authored the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-1083_f204.pdf: Another 6-3 decision determined that the executive branch has the authority to cancel Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations for countries like Syria and Haiti. Furthermore, the ruling establishes that federal law generally bars courts from reviewing these termination decisions and rejected claims that the terminations were driven by racial discrimination. News Coverage: https://www.justsecurity.org/144302/supreme-court-mullin-doe-tps/ (Just Security) The Impact: This clears the way for the government to potentially deport hundreds of thousands of people who were previously granted temporary refuge in the U.S. due to war, natural disasters, or other emergencies in their home countries. #p-8448643-gun-rights-on-private-property-wolford-v-lopez-3Gun Rights on Private Property ( Wolford v. Lopez ) Vote: 6-3 Majority: Justice Alito authored the opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. (Justice Barrett also filed a concurring opinion, which Justices Thomas and Gorsuch joined in part). Dissent: Justice Kagan authored the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1046_nmio.pdf: The Court struck down a Hawaii law that prohibited licensed concealed-carry permit holders from carrying handguns onto private property open to the public (such as businesses or shops) unless the property owner explicitly authorized it. News Coverage: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-hawaii-gun-law-wolford-v-lopez-decision/ (CBS News) The Impact: This ruling significantly expands Second and Fourteenth Amendment protections. It establishes that states cannot create a default ban on carrying firearms in publicly accessible private businesses, shifting the burden onto business owners to actively prohibit firearms if they choose to do so. #p-8448643-corporate-liability-and-product-warnings-monsanto-v-durnell-4Corporate Liability and Product Warnings ( Monsanto v. Durnell ) Vote: 7-2 Majority: Justice Kavanaugh authored the opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Barrett. Dissent: Justice Jackson authored the dissenting opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1068_n7ip.pdf: The Court ruled that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) expressly preempts state-law claims regarding a failure to warn consumers. Specifically, it blocks a lawsuit that would have required Monsanto to add a cancer warning to its Roundup weedkiller labels under state law. News Coverage: https://westernagnetwork.com/scotus-blocks-state-lawsuits-over-roundup-cancer-warnings (Western Ag Network) The Impact: This provides a major legal shield for chemical and pesticide manufacturers. It ensures that as long as a company complies with federal labeling regulations approved by the EPA, they cannot be sued at the state level for failing to include additional health warnings. #p-8448643-deportation-of-permanent-residents-blanche-v-muk-choi-lau-5Deportation of Permanent Residents ( Blanche v. Muk Choi Lau ) Vote: 6-3 Majority: Justice Thomas authored the opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Dissent: Justice Jackson authored the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-429_h3ci.pdf: The Court ruled 6-3 that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) does not need “clear and convincing evidence” that a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) has committed a crime involving “moral turpitude” before pausing their admission into the country. News Coverage: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/4620784/clarence-thomas-dhs-win-denying-criminal-immigrants-us-entry/ (Washington Examiner) The Impact: CBP can now defer the inspection of green card holders suspected of a crime until after they are formally convicted. Once the conviction is secured, the government can use it as direct justification to revoke their status and remove them from the country, streamlining the deportation process for LPRs who commit crimes.

你只负责粘贴，没有摘要吗，要讨论啥

没啥可讨论的，左过头了就向右转呗

/uploads/short-url/pjSRaw2y5RzbZEOvnXjp9kkkWDI.png?dl=1

theo571: 没有摘要吗 额，这不够吗？给了判决，影响和新闻链接了啊

除了6-3还能啥 意识形态橡皮图章 祛魅了

们三权分立就是这样的

第六感薄荷味: 左过头了 在美国这个Democrats 充其量就是个center right 整天为corporation 以及rich donors 服务的党派居然还左过头了

感觉会进吵架版

左过头在哪，富人一直逃税，军工复合体一直狠狠吸民众的血，也就MAGA这种玩身份政治狗哨的能让人觉得美国左过了

美国就不存在左

bumblebee: Deportation of Permanent Residents ( Blanche v. Muk Choi Lau )

这个7:2 阵型真的还蛮少见的。这些case结果感觉不太意外。很期待birthright citizenship 最后怎么ruling

先搞清楚Cultural Left和Economic Left再来发言吧

枪权赞。