我们来看三个巡回法院判例：就算没有投票，注册选民就能驱逐了，尤其是多年之后才撤回申请

第一个判例，Sanchez v. Sessions (4th Cir. 2017)

… The government also presented records indicating that the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections mailed communications to Sanchez at the Bathurst Drive address in 2011 and 2012, and that Sanchez never voted in North Carolina after registering in 2007.

评论：看，这人没投票啊。

When confronted with the government’s evidence, Sanchez denied that he had ever claimed to be a United States citizen. He conceded that the signature on the voter registration card appeared to be his own but testified that he did not recall signing it, adding that he “believe[d] the voter registration card with his signature may have been in some paperwork at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) that he signed when obtaining his driver’s license” and that “he was unaware he was registered to vote.” He also denied “receiv[ing] mail at his home from the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections,” although he confirmed the accuracy of his home address on the voter registration card…

他承认了签名看起来是他的，但是他记不得他签过这个名字了。

Moreover, given that the purported recantation was made seven years after the false claim, it cannot be considered timely. Sanchez claims that he first became aware of the false claim in December 2014…

评论：就算勾选自己是美国公民，及时撤回申请就可以。这人是七年才要求撤回注册投票申请，联邦法官认为，七年这个时间，不算及时。

At bottom, because the BIA reasonably concluded that Sanchez’s new evidence was not material to the Immigration Judge’s finding in the underlying proceeding that he had falsely represented himself as a U.S. citizen for a purpose or benefit under Federal or State law, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I), it did not abuse its discretion when it affirmed the Immigration Judge’s denial of Sanchez’s motion to reopen. Sanchez’s petition for review is DENIED.

结果：这个人被驱逐了。

govinfo.gov

USCOURTS-ca4-16-01282-0.pdf

173.87 KB

第二个判例，Agholor v. Holder (5th Cir. 2011)

Checking a box in response to an unequivocal statement of citizenship is a representation of citizenship. Agholor argues that the voter registration form apprised her that it would be perjury to falsely represent other facts, but did not offer similar warnings with respect to falsely representing her citizenship. This observation has no bearing on our application of § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I). As Agholor concedes, a false representation of citizenship under § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I) need not be made knowingly or wilfully, therefore the absence of a warning addressing the consequences of representing one’s citizenship is immaterial.

巡回法官在这里下了结论，不需要事先提醒你谎称公民的后果。

Further, a person who represents her citizenship on a voter registration form makes that representation for a benefit under the law. Agholor argues that she received no benefit from being registered to vote because she registered under the mistaken belief that registering to vote was a necessary step in renewing her driver’s license. Because she did not vote or in fact need to register to vote to renew her driver’s license, she contends that she received no benefit. Agholor’s argument misses the point: being registered to vote is a benefit under the law because it permits a person to vote, even if the person does not. The moment Agholor obtained the status of registered voter, she obtained a benefit,

评论：这人也没投票，巡回法官写得特别明确，注册投票本身就是法律之下的一个福利，因为注册投票允许一个人投票，就算他没投票。

Happiness Agholor petitions for review of BIA decisions adverse to her. We lack jurisdiction over one issue raised in her petition and agree with the BIA as to the other issue raised. In registering to vote, Agholor falsely represented her citizenship for a benefit—being registered to vote—under the law. Agholor’s petition is DENIED

这就是案子的结论了，谎称自己是公民，注册投票，就驱逐了。

cases.justia.com

10-60853.0.wpd-2011-12-20.pdf

81.72 KB

每天晚上给潭友讲一个惊悚小故事，三楼归我了，请看四楼

【引用自 未知】:
要不要Cancel Registration 法律
今天逛论坛的时候发现了这个帖子： [转载]底特律惊魂夜: 住机场牢房+遣返+吊销合法H1B签证（Voter Registration）
随便搜了搜家人的状态，结果感觉天塌了。发现在NJ是Active身份是RA，但是没有voting history，只有一条2020年被邮寄选票的记录，但是并没有寄回。球球各位谭友帮我做个决定，要不要明天去Cancel Registration。我现在处于精神恍惚的…
他的家人如果折腾，可能也会折腾出来一个 case

人都走了真的有意义折腾么，更何况已有前车之鉴，不经意注册的也算是故意。

如何安慰这个 OP 和他家人呢，真是 tragedy

技术上有没有可能造成有人恶意用他人信息注册选民？

起码人还活着还能重新开始，要是钱也折腾没了就难受了

这种是不是要亲自举证

就算有这个证据证明他人恶意，也只有绿卡可以入境撕逼

我感觉CBP掌握大量个人信息（包括地址SSN），他们看哪个非公民不爽了，先直接去注册一下，然后下次这个人入境的时候说你已经注册过，直接不让入境。细思极恐啊。

遣返签证没有成本，是他们的权力，这么搞，还真能搞成

【引用自 kc46】:
我感觉CBP掌握大量个人信息（包括地址SSN），他们看哪个非公民不爽了，先直接去注册一下
CBP officer这么干会被FBI调查哦

撑起法律板块半壁江山啊

他承认了签名看起来是他的，但是他记不得他签过这个名字了。
【引用自 northface】:
评论：就算勾选自己是美国公民，及时撤回申请就可以。
不敢苟同。明明不是美国公民还去登记投票是赤裸裸的欺诈，阁下的逻辑类似于“我偷了你的钱，及时还给你就可以”。

E. Timely Retraction

An alien is not inadmissible if he or she made a timely retraction of the fraud or misrepresentation.[54] If an alien timely retracts the statement, an officer can then adjudicate the case as if the fraud or misrepresentation had never happened.

Similarly, an alien may also timely retract a false claim to U.S. citizenship. If the alien does so, he or she would not be inadmissible under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(ii). The retraction must be voluntary and timely to be effective.[55] The alien must correct the false claim before an officer or U.S. government official challenges the alien’s truthfulness and before the conclusion of the proceeding during which the alien made the false claim. A retraction can only be timely if the alien makes it in the same proceeding in which the alien gives the false testimony or misrepresentation.[56]

Admitting to the false claim after an official has challenged the accuracy of the claim is not a timely retraction.[57]

USCIS – 20 Aug 25

Chapter 2 - Determining False Claim to U.S. Citizenship

An alien is inadmissible based on a false claim to U.S. citizenship if:The alien made a representation of U.S. citizenship;The representation was false; and

注册选民一般需要 SSN 或者 驾照号码，不是那么容易（我知道很多人的 SSN 都已经在暗网了

算上最近那个保险漏的，我觉得把大厂h1b全注册了问题不大，像wa只要ssn后四位。。

其实直接给全美所有人都注册一遍就好了，对这个 voter registration 系统进行 DOS 攻击，这样人人都被注册就相当于人人都没有注册

大家不觉得其实是政府的系统太烂吗？你明明可以把门关好关牢。可是你不，你大开着门，只是在门口写着闲人免进，那难免有人误入。你的惩罚又如此残暴，哪怕人家什么也没偷。太不公平了。

我看过这集，是小留诱捕之基地里的麦当劳

这个只能说是信用社会传统而且民主党故意的

【引用自 findclans】:
你明明可以把门关好关牢
共和党说要搞这个很多年了，民主党说这么一搞很多合法的人的投票权会受到影响（which is true）所以就只能这么搁置了

【引用自 lyy】:
合法的人的投票权会受到影响
应该是通过立法保证合法的人都能拿到ID用来投票而不是不查ID？

【引用自 李十三】:
合法的人都能拿到ID
不是所有合法的人都想要政府收集他们的信息并且统一颁发id

我记得这是民主党的立场

【引用自 lyy】:
不是所有合法的人都想要政府收集他们的信息并且统一颁发id
我记得这是民主党的立场
不需要是联邦统一ID，反正现在每个州都有自己的ID，甚至还有 REAL ID。现在主要的问题是很多地方选民注册根本不管你是不是有投票权？

【引用自 李十三】:
现在主要的问题是很多地方选民注册根本不管你是不是有投票权？
是的。但是这是各州自己管理的，联邦好像无权插手

SAVE Act 有新的要求，基本上要求 in person 验证公民权

我觉得这个至少得把低收入办证免费了才合理，还有补办出生证明 SSN 之类的费用，否则有投票税的嫌疑

【引用自 duckspeak】:
否则有投票税的嫌疑
这是 feature not bug

本质上都是 voter disenfranchisement 的设计

好吧看来7年确实算不上timely

【引用自 findclans】:
你明明可以把门关好关牢
【引用自 lyy】:
共和党说要搞这个很多年了，民主党说这么一搞很多合法的人的投票权会受到影响（which is true）所以就只能这么搁置了
明明可以不用二极管（比如申请驾照时能明确显示是非公民的就不要问，而不是说要把“在办驾照时把注册投票整个拿掉），但是呢它偏不

纯属两边政治斗争，然后眼睛没看清楚的非公民遭殃

欢迎收看本期今日说法，我是撒北脸

当街枪毙美国公民到现在连个屁都没放，人民抗议一下就过去了。非公民本届政府还在乎？

如何检查自己是否错误registered to vote?

WA 还挺好查 只要姓名和生日

IL还要zip code street number 如果搬了几次家就没那么好查了

【引用自 浅吟低唱】:
但是呢它偏不
现在两党不就是这样嘛，一个极左一个极右。中间派的都死绝了，只剩下两坨不一样风味的让人选

用驾照地址查。讨论怎么查的帖子在隔壁

Voter注册/状态检查（50州统一入口）的网址

【引用自 折木奉太郎】:
不经意注册的也算是故意
终于见到一个明事理的了，确实是这样。

这造假证据太简单了吧，上庭前帮你申请表上打个勾都来得及，你怎么证明你提交的时候没打过勾

【引用自 zzr215】:
当街枪毙美国公民到现在连个屁都
每天美国执法部门得当街枪毙多少美国公民

那个事儿本身fleeing顶多算个执法过度

除非那次ICE没表明身份