【无人在意的角落】印第安纳州众议院通过法案：中国学生就读公立大学敏感专业需经过安全审查并每年签署声明，涵盖本科到博士后的所有阶段

ACLU of Indiana

Discrimination Against People from Countries Deemed Foreign Adversaries (HB...

This bill would create sweeping restrictions against people from countries that have been deemed as “foreign adversaries” by the federal government (including China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia), as well as any other country designated as a threat...

https://legiscan.com/IN/bill/HB1099/2026

怪不得普渡从去年开始就主动撤中国学生的offer，可能已经听到风声了。目前已经录取的学生由于grandfathering条款不受限制。

该法案还包括禁止买房，限制租房的条款。

敏感专业现在不是签证都拿不到吗，反正就是加入喽

这里把本科生也包括进去了。以及他这个敏感专业定义非常广泛：

Screenshot 2026-02-12 at 11.59.26 AM844×466 27.8 KB

基本上是除了Civil以外的所有工科，而且还有兜底条款。

iu和pu不是本来也不要中国学生了？

土木最赢的一集

PU今年还是招了一些美本读PhD或者MS。

不过这个法案限制的是state institution。所以Notre Dame这种大概不受影响。

合法身份秒了。下一题

利好理科，大家都来学数学物理

以后IN州就Notre Dame可以去了

Biology or biomedical engineering都不是? 还有，AI 不是一个专业。。。

出法案的是小学森吧

主要有那个兜底条款在谁也不知道会还包括什么 譬如Nuclear Physics, Quantum Physics算不算呢？

ai有些学校是有单独设专业的

【引用自 MegaBrother】:
AI 不是一个专业。。。
原文是 field of study 啊，也没说是专业

Anyway，君子不立危墙之下，IN的大学相比TX差远了，大家都能放弃TX没理由放弃不了IN。找个安全的蓝州苟完几年然后迅速跑路就好。

执行层面是行政部门的事情。。。出法案的人估计没想那么细。而且不是有兜底条款吗，加什么进去都是可能的。

出法案的可能真不知道，随便丢几个敏感词

material science也没有上榜

学好数理化，走遍天下都不怕

你要这么说连Aerospace都没有呢 我估计都在兜底条款里了。

以前普度还是大力招收中国学生的，而且当时校长还是前IN州长，令人唏嘘

当时收到了phd offer，还好因为工资实在太牛马没去

居然没有Materials Engineering

川普之前的共和党确实是支持高技术移民的，所以也不奇怪。。。

TX大家还是会可惜一下的，IN就好像一只路边的野狗

建议没身份的黄MAGA去，反正成分好可以过审查

tx也快了

chemical engineering不知道有啥好敏感的。现在chemE和chem一样都是搞材料灌水，哪有人做正经chemE的东西

太小看土木人了吧。。。。

【引用自 ACS】:
chemical engineering不知道有啥好敏感的
有可能只是带个engineering字眼的都当是敏感了

TX应该是“已经”了吧。公立大学回国探亲都得打报告。。。

美国还真是敏感，G点真多哈

IU有的方向很好的，比如security，但也在被狠狠针对。

Thinking Machine Lab有个创始成员就是IU毕业的PhD

【引用自 xxxyyy】:
IU有的方向很好的，比如security，但也在被狠狠针对。
前情提要：

https://www.uscardforum.com/t/topic/371780/

如果这样子的话，tx应该加速了吧

TX早这么干了我记得。。。它应该是第一个出台类似法案的。不过扩张到本科的IN是第一个。

但是没通过吧。。。

【引用自 AppleVisionPro】:
material science
【引用自 凉了啊】:
Materials Engineering
【引用自 ACS】:
搞材料灌水
东西大都看不上的玩意

生化环材又天坑又被认为高大上，才是最惨的

惊了computer science也算

本科很多人是大二才选专业，这种咋办

那今年刚录取的怎么办，成了四九年的国军吗

10000134601172×2748 337 KB

小红书里已经有人讨论跑路了

大土木果然通吃，stem又不敏感

德州怎么说呢，目前还算能活

干脆美国分成 US red 和 US Blue 算了

请问你要去的是

USA
USB
USC

0
投票人

C是什么 China吗

不是有过Confederate States of America吗？

hate crime可以report给aclu吗

【引用自 Yangff】:
USC
抖下机灵，USC可以指代两所大学：Southern Cal or South Carolina

外加个选项USD - University of South Dakota lol

ACLU可能会帮助起诉州最高法院或者国家最高法院，不然生效的法案还真没法搞

我这篇帖子的第一个链接就是ACLU的声明。我想ACLU可能是会介入的。

Nuclear不算？

Yahoo News

Amid Trump crackdown on Chinese students, one US university appears to block...

Purdue says no ban on Chinese students exists, but reportedly rescinded dozens of offers after warnings from legislators

Amid Trump crackdown on Chinese students, one US university appears to block them altogether

Several have scrapped partnerships with Chinese institutions in recent months as a direct result of pressure from US legislators. But no university appears to have gone as far as Purdue University in [Indiana]

Students and faculty at the public university say that an unofficial policy is in effect to automatically reject students from [China] and a number of other countries altogether.

The alleged shift in admissions practices at Purdue followed sent last year to six universities by the US House’s select committee on the Chinese Communist party (CCP), demanding they turn over data about Chinese students, a population they say jeopardizes national security.

“Our nation’s universities, long regarded as the global standard for excellence and innovation, are increasingly used as conduits for foreign adversaries to illegally gain access to critical research and advanced technology,” the committee wrote, adding that the admission of large number of Chinese students into science, technology, engineering and mathematics programs came “potentially at the expense of qualified Americans”.

Students, faculty and alumni are organizing against what they say is a blanket but unwritten policy to block the admission of students from China and other countries the US has designated as “adversary nations” – including Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea. [The Lafayette Journal & Courier] first reported on the alleged ban in December.

In a [letter]addressed to Purdue leadership, which was publicized Friday and shared exclusively with the Guardian, dozens of signatories argue that the university “soft banning students based on their nationality erodes higher education’s core values of meritocracy, equality and academic freedom”. They called on Purdue to clarify any instructions it has given graduate admissions committees and to restore offers to scores of international students they say the university rescinded last year.

Purdue denies such a policy exists. Erin Murphy, a spokesperson for the university, wrote in a statement to the Guardian that “there is no ban” – but did not address questions about the letter’s allegations and rescinded offers.

Graduate admissions decisions are typically made by individual departments. The university signs off on offers, a step that in the past amounted to a formality. But last year, several foreign students reported receiving offers and funding from various departments at Purdue only to have them rescinded several weeks later with no explanation. In some cases, they had already turned down other offers and signed leases in Lafayette.

“I was shocked,” said one student from China. “I thought maybe they sent the rejection to the wrong guy.”

The student, who asked that he and the department not to be named as he continues to work independently with a Purdue faculty member, said that he had turned down offers from three other universities. He said the supervisor was equally blind-sided by Purdue’s decision. “He couldn’t do anything,” the student said. “They refused to provide an explanation – it was like a black box.”

Purdue’s alleged ban would be among the most severe manifestations of the Trump administration’s [campaign against international students] Last year, the administration abruptly canceled the visas of thousands of students – [many of them Chinese]– and froze billions of dollars in research funding. That landscape has contributed to [plunging enrollments] of foreign students at US universities and boosted [rival institutions overseas] in what experts warn will permanently degrade the global standing of US scientific research.

Another student, who also asked not to be named, received an offer from Purdue’s chemistry department last March, but the university rescinded it without elaboration in May. Several months later, the student, who also turned down other offers in the US and remains in China, learned from a faculty member that “there was an internal requirement not to admit Chinese students”, the student said. “There was no written document provided. It was communicated verbally.”

Other schools also responded to the warning from legislators. Last summer, the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), which like Purdue had received the [letter]from the committee on the CCP, told members of the committee that it would “wind down” a series of partnerships with Chinese universities, according to public records obtained by students there and shared with the Guardian. A spokesperson for the university said the decision followed “a review of international programs within the context of the current policy environment affecting US higher education”.

In December, Columbia University quietly called off an exchange program with China which the congressional committee [had claimed]was funded by a “CCP-linked” organization seeking to “advance Beijing’s interests in the United States”, the Guardian has learned.

Nathan Blade-Smith, a master’s student at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs who was supposed to travel to China through the program, said that the university kept students in limbo for weeks before canceling funding less than a month before the trip was to take place. Blade-Smith, who studies US-China relations, cautioned that the worsening climate for academic exchanges between the countries risks leaving “no opportunity for a next generation of China experts to have intimate experience with the country”.
An escalation against Chinese scholars

In June of last year, Purdue adopted [a new policy] restricting staff and faculty’s dealings with US-designated “adversary nations”, characterizing it as a response to state and federal laws. The policy says nothing about banning students from those countries.

Any shift in policy appears to remain informal. “They more or less demanded that we don’t extend offers or we don’t consider Chinese students,” one faculty member who oversees graduate admissions told [the Lafayette Journal & Courier] “Because there’s nothing in writing, there’s no policy I can point to,” another faculty member told the newspaper. Purdue has since warned faculty against speaking with the media.

The Federation of Asian Professor Associations, a national alliance of faculty associations, called the alleged ban “unethical” and questioned whether it might violate Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits publicly funded institutions from discriminating on the basis of race, color or national origin.

“Substituting categorical admissions exclusions for individualized compliance measures reflects not principled legal judgment but institutional risk-avoidance driven by political calculation,” the group wrote in a December statement.

The University of Maryland, the University of Southern California, Stanford and Carnegie Mellon also received the congressional letter, though none of them appear to have taken actions against students.

The congressional letters targeting individual universities are an escalation of policies targeting Chinese scholars in recent years.

[Proclamation 10043], a directive issued by Trump during his first term, barred hundreds of students the administration said have ties to the Chinese military from obtaining visas. And in 2018, Trump’s justice department announced the [China Initiative], which sought to identify Chinese spies at US universities but which critics said resulted in racial profiling and harmed technological competitiveness. The Biden administration shut down the initiative in 2022 but Proclamation 10043 remains in effect.

“What’s happening at Purdue isn’t isolated,” said Valentina Dallona, political director of Justice Is Global, a group that advocates for progressive US-China relations. “National security fears are eclipsing decades of academic collaboration.”

Rose Ying, a graduate student organizer at the University of Maryland, said that the targeting of Chinese scholars has created a palpable chill. “People have been very, very cautious about traveling, about saying or doing anything,” she added. “They don’t want to get stopped at the border”.

A Chinese graduate student at the UIUC, who asked for anonymity to avoid attracting scrutiny, said that in private chats, many Chinese students were advising prospective applicants back home to seek opportunities in Europe, Canada and Australia instead of the US, or choosing to stay in China.

“As graduate workers, we are not paid a lot but we do a whole lot of work,” she said. “Our work benefits American industry and science.”

所以现在印第安纳州的大学到底啥样子？