泥潭日报 uscardforum · 每日精选

Costco集体诉讼有无发财机会

内容摘要

Costco会员费自动扣费引发集体诉讼,坛友关注后续Settlement机会。

1. 关键信息

  • 诉讼事由:Costco因Gold Star membership自动扣费(Auto-renewal)通知及操作流程问题遭遇Class Action。
  • 争议点:公司在自动扣款前60天邮件通知,但原告质疑其扣费合规性。

2. 羊毛/优惠信息

  • 潜在补偿:用户期望通过Settlement获得数十刀补偿。

3. 最新动态

  • 阶段:目前仅为提起诉讼阶段,尚未达成Settlement,无法申请赔偿。

4. 争议或不同意见

  • 内容形式:有坛友抱怨只发链接不贴正文,阅读体验不佳。

5. 行动建议

  • 保持关注:目前处于早期,建议“插眼”蹲点,等待法院下达Preliminary Approval及随后的Claim表格发布。
原始内容
--- 第 1 楼来自 jnnksn 的回复 (2026-04-09 10:15:06 PDT) ---

https://www.oregonlive.com/retail/2026/04/new-class-action-lawsuit-targets-costco-memberships.html

--- 第 2 楼来自 今天你xx了吗 的回复 (2026-04-09 10:19:45 PDT) ---

蹲一波前排

--- 第 3 楼来自 goFIRE 的回复 (2026-04-09 10:21:21 PDT) ---

插眼 希望能薅个几十刀

--- 第 4 楼来自 ericxi 的回复 (2026-04-09 10:22:27 PDT) ---

还没到settlement的阶段

--- 第 5 楼来自 酸酸眨着眼 的回复 (2026-04-09 10:22:37 PDT) ---

默默插眼

--- 第 6 楼来自 xy1 的回复 (2026-04-09 10:24:40 PDT) ---

前排名字

--- 第 7 楼来自 lclin 的回复 (2026-04-09 10:24:42 PDT) ---

插眼zszs

--- 第 8 楼来自 gojo 的回复 (2026-04-09 10:25:13 PDT) ---

插个眼,关注后续

--- 第 9 楼来自 eee 的回复 (2026-04-09 11:07:24 PDT) ---

关注后续

--- 第 10 楼来自 lionlin 的回复 (2026-04-09 11:26:30 PDT) ---

啥也看不了,把正文复制一下比复制链接多不了几秒钟吧

--- 第 11 楼来自 geae 的回复 (2026-04-09 11:34:54 PDT) ---

同蹲同蹲

--- 第 12 楼来自 AMEX2025 的回复 (2026-04-10 04:59:27 PDT) ---

插眼蹲一下

--- 第 13 楼来自 Define_P 的回复 (2026-04-10 05:10:48 PDT) ---

Costco’s basic Gold Star membership https://archive.ph/o/58PL8/https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2024/07/costco-will-increase-membership-fees-for-first-time-since-2017.html and is required to shop at the store. The company alerts members via email 60 days before automatically charging their credit cards, according to the lawsuit. This notice, though, falls outside the 45-day warning period mandated by https://archive.ph/o/58PL8/https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=BPC&division=7.&title=&part=3.&chapter=1.&article=9.. “Due to Costco’s untimely and deficient auto-renewal notice,” the lawsuit reads, as https://archive.ph/o/58PL8/https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/costco-hit-with-class-action-over-unexpected-membership-renewals/, “the plaintiff was deprived of information he was statutorily entitled to that would have notified him of the upcoming auto-renewal and provided him with methods of cancellation.” A similar standard is not outlined in https://archive.ph/o/58PL8/https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/lawsstatutes/2011orLaw0509.html, which does not specify a time frame in which companies must warn customers of an upcoming auto-renewal. Another https://archive.ph/o/58PL8/https://www.classaction.org/news/costco-increased-prices-for-consumers-under-illegal-tariffs-class-action-lawsuit-claims also takes aim at Costco — alleging that the retailer unfairly passed the cost of https://archive.ph/o/58PL8/https://www.oregonlive.com/retail/2026/04/heres-how-much-trumps-tariffs-are-costing-you-for-clothes-furniture-groceries-and-more-1-year-after-liberation-day.html duties onto customers. And earlier this year, the warehouse chain was https://archive.ph/o/58PL8/https://www.oregonlive.com/retail/2026/02/a-pair-of-class-action-lawsuits-slams-costcos-iconic-499-rotisserie-chicken.html related to its popular $4.99 rotisserie chickens. https://archive.ph/58PL8