泥潭日报 uscardforum · 每日精选

sephora 年度防晒套装上了 几天就会卖完

内容摘要

每年防晒套装断货快,值不值得囤需斟酌。

1. 关键信息

  • 科颜氏正装防晒回本,今年新增矿物正装与中样(#1 #5)。
  • 可选两香水小样+折扣码小样(#2)。
  • 套装含中样(7-15ml)与正装(#5)。
  • FSA/HSAs 覆盖 SPF15+(#29)。
  • 去年四月断货(#7);今年或 4/21 App 首发(#60)。

2. 羊毛/优惠信息

  • Sephora Favorites Sun Safety Kit 支持慈善,扣兰捐 25 美元(#1)。
  • PayPal 5% 返现(#9)。
  • 30% off 券 4/18 生效(#45)。
  • 8 折活动临近(#37)。
  • 无其他明确折扣码/CSP/CSR/积分/酒店航司奖励。

3. 最新动态

  • 套装持续售罄,补货待 4/21(#46 #60)。
  • 用户转向矿物防晒(#16)与 Trader Joe’s 替代(#27)。

4. 争议或不同意见

  • SPF 数值争议:SPF30 已 block 96.7%,SPF50 98%,高 SPF 风险与误用(#10 #13)。
  • 美国防晒剂 FDA 审批严 vs 亚洲/欧洲(#14 #15 #18 #22)。
  • 套装性价比与假白/搓泥担忧(#21 #26 #31 #55 #63)。

5. 行动建议

  • 确认 FSA 资格再下单;优先矿物防晒;等 4/18 券或 8 折;试用小样防搓泥。
原始内容
--- 第 1 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-03-31 14:38:35 PDT) ---

Sephora Favorites Sun Safety Kit https://www.sephora.com/product/sephora-favorites-sun-safety-kit-P505730?skuId=2661304 这个防晒套装每年抢断货,不到春季打折就卖完了,不仅可以支持慈善事业(扣兰会捐25刀) 而且光是一个科颜氏的正装就回本,更不如说今年还多了一个矿物防晒正装和很多中样。 送人自用都很划算。

--- 第 2 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-03-31 14:42:06 PDT) ---

另外可以选两个香水小样和一个折扣码小样

--- 第 3 楼来自 23rj-as 的回复 (2023-03-31 14:49:18 PDT) ---

看上去像小样礼包…真的有人会用这么多不同牌子的防晒嘛

--- 第 4 楼来自 ctromg 的回复 (2023-03-31 14:50:36 PDT) ---

美妆博主

--- 第 5 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-03-31 14:51:27 PDT) ---

小样一般7-15ml,这个里面基本都是中样了

--- 第 6 楼来自 twistane 的回复 (2023-03-31 14:54:44 PDT) ---

hscnmm: 而且光是一个科颜氏的正装就回本,更不如说今年还多了一个矿物防晒正装和很多中样。 已买 楼主好人一生平安 主要是现在的trend是说化学防晒的会干扰荷尔蒙 虽然我好奇经皮可以吸收多少 但是还是准备看看矿物质的

--- 第 7 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-03-31 14:58:33 PDT) ---

去年我准备四月中旬打折的时候买的 结果还没开始好像一个星期多以前就断货了

--- 第 8 楼来自 Rocky 的回复 (2023-03-31 15:06:20 PDT) ---

FSA eligible?

--- 第 9 楼来自 Eough 的回复 (2023-03-31 15:45:43 PDT) ---

有在用科颜氏没防晒的所以就买了 Paypal有5%Sephora 我是觉得这些SPF可以高一点

--- 第 10 楼来自 twistane 的回复 (2023-03-31 15:48:34 PDT) ---

SPF其实没有这么大的关系 SPF30可以block 96.7%的紫外线 SPF50可以block 98%的紫外线 你真觉得这1.3%有很大区别么?

--- 第 11 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-03-31 15:51:22 PDT) ---

主要是出汗了要多补涂

--- 第 12 楼来自 jxwbeika 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:14:10 PDT) ---

如果要去海滩可能还是有点区别,至少补涂间隔可以长一点…

--- 第 13 楼来自 twistane 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:20:03 PDT) ---

come on. SPF is a joke from the beginning People trust these high SPF products too much. There are four strikes against SPF values greater than 50+. They include: Poor balance. A sunscreen’s SPF rating has little to do with its capacity to shield the skin from UVA rays. As SPF increases, the ratio of UVA protection decreases. High SPF products suppress sunburn much more effectively than protect from UVA-induced damage, such as suppression of the immune system, formation of harmful free radicals in skin, and development of melanoma. As a result of inadequate UVA standards and limited options for providing UVA protection, U.S. sunscreens offer far less protection against UVA than UVB rays, and this is worse for products with the highest SPF values. Consumers misuse high SPF products. High SPF products tend to lull users into a false sense of security, so they stay in the sun longer and overexpose themselves to both UVA and UVB rays well past the point when users of low SPF products would head indoors. As a result, they get as many UVB-inflicted sunburns as unprotected sunbathers and are likely to absorb more damaging UVA radiation. Sunburn protection is only marginally better. Sunbathers often assume they get twice as much protection from SPF 100 sunscreen as from SPF 50. But the extra protection is negligible. Properly applied SPF 50 sunscreen blocks 98 percent of UVB rays; SPF 100 blocks 99 percent. When used correctly, sunscreen with SPF values between 30 and 50 offers adequate sunburn protection, even for people most sensitive to sunburn. High SPF products may pose greater health risks. High SPF products require higher concentrations of sun-filtering chemicals than low SPF sunscreens do. Some of these ingredients may pose health risks when they penetrate the skin and have been linked to tissue damage and potential hormone disruption. Some may trigger allergic skin reactions. If studies showed that high SPF products were better at reducing skin damage and skin cancer risk, the extra chemical exposure might be justified. But they don’t, so choosing sunscreens with lower concentrations of active ingredients – SPF 30 instead of SPF 70, for example – is prudent. https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/report/whats-wrong-with-high-spf/ https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/report/whats-wrong-with-high-spf/ Theoretically, applying sunscreen with a sun protection factor – SPF – of 100 would allow beachgoers to bare their skin 100 times longer before suffering a sunburn. Someone who would normally redden after 30 minutes in the midday sun could stay out... 你们当心被汗洗就要选择耐汗的,希望不补涂就要选择矿物防嗮的,因为不存在breakdown的问题

--- 第 14 楼来自 jxwbeika 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:23:44 PDT) ---

所以只标spf的美国防晒不靠谱啊… 还是认准 eg 日本的那种带PA++++的靠谱点

--- 第 15 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:24:47 PDT) ---

除非是日版的不然很多防晒剂fda不批

--- 第 16 楼来自 twistane 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:27:55 PDT) ---

防晒我最看好的是这个全矿物的,没有乱七八糟的chemical https://www.amazon.com/Roche-Posay-Anthelios-Mineral-Sunscreen-Gentle/dp/B07HF7VMXZ?tag=uscardforum-20 https://www.amazon.com/Roche-Posay-Anthelios-Mineral-Sunscreen-Gentle/dp/B07HF7VMXZ?tag=uscardforum-20 Amazon.com: La Roche-Posay Anthelios Mineral Sunscreen Gentle Lotion Broad Spectrum SPF 50, Face and Body Sunscreen with Zinc Oxide and Titanium Dioxide, Oxybenzone & Octinoxate Free, Oil-Free : Beauty & Personal Care

--- 第 17 楼来自 twistane 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:29:35 PDT) ---

/uploads/short-url/gHVKou1SjWq0vh3TdJqdB7FfRIk.png?dl=1 FDA不批是因为risk outweigh benefits 或者没有足够的safety data https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/report/the-trouble-with-sunscreen-chemicals/ https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/report/the-trouble-with-sunscreen-chemicals/ Active ingredients in sunscreens come in two forms, mineral and chemical filters. Each uses a different mechanism for protecting skin and maintaining stability in sunlight. Each may pose hazards to human health. The most common sunscreens on the...

--- 第 18 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:34:19 PDT) ---

https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/457698794?utm_id=0 https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/457698794?utm_id=0 说防晒,肯定要谈到防晒剂。 不过那么多年过去了,其实防晒剂本身并没有太多看头,能用的就这么几个。 传统的胡莫柳酯、奥克立林、阿伏苯宗等,由于各方面原因,比如环境污染、皮肤刺激性等,使用的品牌慢慢变少了… 不知道fda会不会批

--- 第 19 楼来自 jhopargyt 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:36:08 PDT) ---

上头想买,然后想起美国防晒根本不好使

--- 第 20 楼来自 jxwbeika 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:41:38 PDT) ---

不是学化学的,所以一直都没太搞懂,如果老哥懂的话还请不吝赐教… 所以美国FDA不批而欧洲亚洲都批,仅仅是因为FDA更加谨慎?还是因为FDA太过守旧? 比如很多日本牌子会用的bemotrizinol,是真的有安全方面的concern吗?

--- 第 21 楼来自 tinyraveen 的回复 (2023-03-31 16:52:22 PDT) ---

这是花钱买小样啊。。折扣太烂

--- 第 22 楼来自 twistane 的回复 (2023-03-31 17:01:30 PDT) ---

jxwbeika: bemotrizinol Many in the personal care world question if the FDA is taking the right approach. In the 2015 meeting, according to records published by the agency, BASF suggested that the FDA adopt a “weight of evidence” approach to sunscreen safety, more in line with EU regulators. The FDA firmly rebuffed the idea, as it has in other forums, saying that a full suite of absorption and toxicology studies, including human and animal trials, is needed to ensure that the ingredients are safe. 回答就是不知道 但是没有数据也不敢用啊 https://www.happi.com/issues/2022-12-01/view_sunscreen-filter/where-is-american-ingenuity-regarding-uv-filter-development/#:~:text=This%20molecule%2C%20commercially%20called%20Mexoryl,that%20follow%20US%20FDA%20regulations.

--- 第 23 楼来自 muji 的回复 (2023-03-31 17:19:58 PDT) ---

好想要看那个pa+++啥的?有个妹妹说那个是防晒黑的?

--- 第 24 楼来自 jjzz789 的回复 (2023-03-31 17:31:54 PDT) ---

2 full size included

--- 第 25 楼来自 Will 的回复 (2023-03-31 18:17:13 PDT) ---

Kiehl’s和Murad两个就完全够本了(虽然并不知道好不好用

--- 第 26 楼来自 siuu 的回复 (2023-03-31 18:27:48 PDT) ---

里面那个murad的我觉得容易搓泥 夏天出油很多感觉会更灾难……

--- 第 27 楼来自 23rj-as 的回复 (2023-03-31 18:43:03 PDT) ---

我现在在用这个Trader Joe’s的防晒,$8.99买不了吃亏买不了上当 https://www.traderjoes.com/home/products/pdp/daily-facial-sunscreen-spf-40-073568 https://www.traderjoes.com/home/products/pdp/daily-facial-sunscreen-spf-40-073568

--- 第 28 楼来自 Ki7 的回复 (2023-03-31 20:51:19 PDT) ---

听说这个很好用貌似很多地方都卖断货了

--- 第 29 楼来自 Ki7 的回复 (2023-03-31 20:51:49 PDT) ---

真的可以fsa/hsa吗 edit: 查了spf15以上就可以,去快乐报销前两天ulta五折买的资生堂蓝胖子了

--- 第 30 楼来自 Ford 的回复 (2023-03-31 20:54:55 PDT) ---

感觉里面样式太多 选择困难

--- 第 31 楼来自 黑卡会员 的回复 (2023-04-01 13:43:44 PDT) ---

这么多东西不会变成试验田嘛

--- 第 32 楼来自 jerrywoox 的回复 (2023-04-01 14:17:37 PDT) ---

啊差点忘了这一套,感谢提醒!囤起来

--- 第 33 楼来自 jhopargyt 的回复 (2023-04-01 15:14:28 PDT) ---

可恶,去年买的…可能有电子收据吧

--- 第 34 楼来自 tomari 的回复 (2023-04-01 16:18:53 PDT) ---

卧槽 怎么那么多瓶 本直男只想要一瓶

--- 第 35 楼来自 divinebaboon 的回复 (2023-04-01 16:30:41 PDT) ---

送人啊,同事什么的

--- 第 36 楼来自 x.94 的回复 (2023-04-01 20:54:35 PDT) ---

挺好用的,之前网上都说是Supergoop!平替

--- 第 37 楼来自 hermione 的回复 (2023-04-03 17:57:41 PDT) ---

快要8折活动了 买早了的同学想不想哭

--- 第 38 楼来自 CooCoo 的回复 (2023-04-03 18:29:38 PDT) ---

不哭 早防晒两天 就能比别的老男人多嫩两天

--- 第 39 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-04-03 19:42:47 PDT) ---

去年也是这样 等8折还没开始就oos了

--- 第 40 楼来自 alibaba 的回复 (2023-04-03 20:03:43 PDT) ---

能不能推荐个这里面最好用的

--- 第 41 楼来自 jerrywoox 的回复 (2023-04-06 08:17:39 PDT) ---

去年打折开始前卖完了

--- 第 42 楼来自 hermione 的回复 (2023-04-13 22:06:12 PDT) ---

打折开始了 这个套装还活着

--- 第 43 楼来自 DiuDiu 的回复 (2023-04-13 22:39:14 PDT) ---

谢谢赫老师

--- 第 44 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-04-14 07:55:54 PDT) ---

好的 再买一个把贵的退掉

--- 第 45 楼来自 divinebaboon 的回复 (2023-04-14 08:06:10 PDT) ---

for regular Beauty Insider members, the 30% off coupon SAVENOW can’t be used until 4/18? Edit: nvm I’d only get 10% off on 4/18

--- 第 46 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-04-14 08:07:07 PDT) ---

oos了

--- 第 47 楼来自 divinebaboon 的回复 (2023-04-14 08:07:45 PDT) ---

I can order for pickup in store, just can’t use any discounts

--- 第 48 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2023-04-14 08:07:52 PDT) ---

这个不算7折的吧 应该是按等级折的 不过昨天睡的早没抢到

--- 第 49 楼来自 divinebaboon 的回复 (2023-04-14 08:12:22 PDT) ---

好吧,那昨晚的discount我错过了 reddit 上有product expiration date: Summer Fridays (5ml, mineral) - 01/2024 Josie Maran (15ml, mineral) - 02/2024 Biossance (20ml, mineral) - 06/2024 First Aid Beauty (full size, 50ml, mineral) - 07/2024 innisfree (10ml, chemical) - 08/2024 Supergoop (15ml, chemical) - 08/2024 Kiehl’s (full size, 50ml, chemical) - 08/2024 Murad (23ml, chemical) - 10/2024 Dr. Dennis Gross (30ml, mineral) - 11/2024 Peter Thomas Roth (5ml, chemical) - 11/2024 Glow Recipe (10ml, combination mineral and chemical) - 12/2024 Cay Skin (10ml, chemical) - 12/2024 Saint Jane (25ml, mineral) - 12/2024 Dr.Jart+ (10ml, mineral) - 08/2025

--- 第 50 楼来自 hermione 的回复 (2023-04-16 19:16:26 PDT) ---

店内取货的话记得现场打开看一下 店关门了我才发现少了一个

--- 第 51 楼来自 fashui2012 的回复 (2024-04-14 20:01:15 PDT) ---

24年的是不是不划算了

--- 第 52 楼来自 Will 的回复 (2024-04-14 20:08:18 PDT) ---

去年的都非常难用…

--- 第 53 楼来自 tinyraveen 的回复 (2024-04-14 20:19:38 PDT) ---

看你挖了贴 我特地去看了一下 真的太不划算 去年好歹有正装契尔氏 firstaid 今年这是个啥。。。。

--- 第 54 楼来自 Pengye94 的回复 (2024-04-15 06:44:46 PDT) ---

这个好涂开吗?我涂mineral的经常白得跟鬼一样

--- 第 55 楼来自 hscnmm 的回复 (2024-04-15 16:18:19 PDT) ---

今年很不值 全是差评

--- 第 56 楼来自 Ki7 的回复 (2026-04-19 09:53:50 PDT) ---

今年的出了感觉还可以 https://www.sephora.com/product/sun-safety-kit-P522113?skuId=2962843&icid2=products%20grid:p522113:product

--- 第 57 楼来自 EVA1 的回复 (2026-04-19 09:55:36 PDT) ---

有没有大样

--- 第 58 楼来自 ttshutian 的回复 (2026-04-19 09:59:56 PDT) ---

附近都没货

--- 第 59 楼来自 yuwei_0712 的回复 (2026-04-19 10:16:22 PDT) ---

附近没货….

--- 第 60 楼来自 llbean 的回复 (2026-04-19 10:34:25 PDT) ---

Coming Soon Available 4/21 in App, all other platforms on 4/22

--- 第 61 楼来自 rightnow 的回复 (2026-04-19 10:50:48 PDT) ---

这全是小样真的有$218 value吗……

--- 第 62 楼来自 黑卡会员 的回复 (2026-04-20 23:30:10 PDT) ---

有种拿自己的脸当试验田的感觉

--- 第 63 楼来自 llbean 的回复 (2026-04-20 23:51:00 PDT) ---

想了想觉得防晒这玩意本来就难找到适合自己的,假白搓泥流白汗辣眼睛,还是别赌这么多牌子里有多少好用的吧…